Two neighbours talking on a sidewalk at dusk in front of a partly built multiplex with construction fencing
Legal & Compliance

Two Owners, One Council: When a Duplex Strata Deadlocks

8 min read

In a two-lot BC strata both owners are the council and neither has a tie-breaking vote. What the tribunal ordered in 2017 BCCRT 26, and the tools the Strata Property Act gives two owners who cannot agree.

Key takeaway

In a BC two-lot strata using the Standard Bylaws, both owners are the council (Bylaw 9(2)), council decides by majority of members present (Bylaw 18(1)), and there is no president's tie-break at council or general meetings (Bylaws 18(2), 27(6)), so the owners deadlock when they disagree.

In 2017 BCCRT 26, a duplex near Sooke that had no meetings, fees, reserve fund or bank account, the tribunal called one owner's effective veto untenable and made specific orders on a seawall repair, yearly inspections, cost sharing and a dispute process. Tools for two owners include the s.48(3) adjourned-meeting quorum rule, a council hearing then a Civil Resolution Tribunal claim ($125 online), a BC Supreme Court administrator under s.174, a court-appointed voter under s.58, and arbitration under s.177. The s.52 unanimous-vote override applies only at 10 or more lots.

What this covers

  • two-lot strata council deadlock
  • no tie-break Standard Bylaws 18 and 27
  • 2017 BCCRT 26 seawall duplex
  • s.48(3) adjourned meeting quorum
  • court-appointed administrator s.174
  • arbitration s.177
strata-app strata duplex-strata strata-council deadlock civil-resolution-tribunal

In a two-lot strata, both owners are the council, and neither has a tie-breaking vote. When they disagree, no council decision can pass. That was the situation in Bourque et al v. McKnight et al, 2017 BCCRT 26, a duplex on the water near Sooke. For years the two owners could not agree on repairs to a seawall or on the upkeep of one side of the property. The Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT), BC’s online tribunal for strata disputes, said the arrangement “effectively gives the respondent owner a veto power before the strata can take any action” and called it “untenable”. Then it made specific orders to end the deadlock on each issue.

This post covers why a duplex deadlocks under the BC Strata Property Act, what that decision ordered, and the tools the Act gives two owners who cannot agree. Our guide to when owners disagree covers three-lot stratas too.

Why two owners deadlock

The Standard Bylaws, which apply unless a strata files its own, put every owner on council when there are fewer than 4 lots (Standard Bylaw 9(2)). Then four rules meet:

RuleWhat it means in a duplexWhere
Council decides by majority of members presentOne of two is not a majorityStandard Bylaw 18(1)
No tie-break at council when there are only 2 lotsThe president has no second voteStandard Bylaw 18(2)
No tie-break at general meetings when there are only 2 lotsSame at owners’ meetingsStandard Bylaw 27(6)
A 3/4 vote needs at least 3/4 of the votes castBoth owners must vote yes if both voteSPA s.1

A council member who is the subject of a bylaw complaint must not take part in the decision on it (s.136(1)). That rule does not apply when all owners are on council (s.136(2)), so in a duplex the accused owner still votes on their own complaint. The tribunal in 2017 BCCRT 26 pointed to that same section.

What the tribunal found and ordered in 2017

The tribunal member, Vice Chair Shelley Lopez, found the strata “has operated informally without complying with the SPA and the applicable bylaws”: no regular council meetings, no regular annual general meetings, no strata fees, no contingency reserve fund and no strata bank account. The duplex used the Standard Bylaws.

The decision, issued June 12, 2017, made orders on each issue:

  • Seawall. The tribunal found the seawall was a structure enclosing a yard under Standard Bylaw 8, so the strata must repair and maintain it. It ordered the strata to repair the Lot A side in the same way as the Lot B side had been repaired in 2010, get 3 quotes, and let the applicants choose a contractor if the owners could not agree within 14 days. It ordered the Lot A owner to pay the entire cost of those repairs.
  • Inspections. The strata must arrange a yearly inspection of each home and yard by a qualified home inspector, with 48 hours’ notice under Standard Bylaw 7. If the owners could not agree on an inspector or contractor within 14 days, the Lot B owner could hire one for the strata.
  • Who pays. Each owner pays for their own yard and for the inspection of their own lot. Repairs to common property, including the driveway, the roof, windows and skylights, are shared equally.
  • Day-to-day disputes. The tribunal dismissed the request to rewrite the bylaws. It ordered the strata to join a strata owners’ association, with the membership cost shared equally, and allowed the owners to agree in writing to have a third party decide a dispute.
  • Fees. The Lot A owner was ordered to pay the other owners’ $225 in tribunal fees.

The tribunal also noted it cannot appoint an administrator, and that if the owners stay unable to cooperate, “an administrator may be an appropriate but expensive solution”.

Tool 1: the general meeting, and what happens if one owner stays away

A general meeting needs a quorum. When there are fewer than 4 lots, that is voters holding 2/3 of the votes (s.48(2)(b)). In a duplex, both owners.

Section 48(3) deals with an owner who does not come. Unless the bylaws say otherwise, if there is no quorum within half an hour, the meeting is adjourned to the same day and time the next week. If there is still no quorum within half an hour at that meeting, “the eligible voters present in person or by proxy constitute a quorum.”

Majority and 3/4 votes count the votes cast by those present who do not abstain (s.1). A unanimous vote counts all eligible voters, present or not. So an owner who stays away from two meetings in a row can lose their say on a majority or 3/4 vote, but never on a unanimous one. Get legal advice before relying on an adjourned meeting for a large decision, and keep the notices and minutes. Our page on AGMs in a small strata covers notice and timing.

Tool 2: a hearing, then the Civil Resolution Tribunal

  1. Ask council for a hearing in writing, with your reason. Council must meet to hear you within 4 weeks, and give a written decision within 1 week after if you asked for one (s.34.1). In a duplex, council is you and your neighbour. The request is still required before most tribunal claims (s.189.1).
  2. File with the CRT. It hears strata claims of any amount. The fee is $125 online or $150 by mail, plus $100 if you ask for a final decision. Responding is free online.
  3. Ask for orders that fit the problem. The tribunal can order a party to do or stop doing something, or to pay money (Civil Resolution Tribunal Act s.123), and can make orders to remedy a “significantly unfair” action or decision by the strata, the council, or a person holding 50% or more of the votes (s.123(2)). In a duplex, each owner holds 50%.

Our disputes guide explains the steps and the limits of what the tribunal can hear.

Tool 3: the BC Supreme Court

Some matters only the court can decide. The tribunal cannot hear them (Civil Resolution Tribunal Act s.122):

  • An administrator. An owner can ask the Supreme Court to appoint an administrator to run the strata, paid by the strata (s.174). In Siddons v. Gilzean, 2018 BCCRT 448, another two-lot strata, the tribunal wrote that it “would not be the first deadlocked duplex to be run by an administrator”, naming a 2016 BC Supreme Court case.
  • A voter for a lot. If there is no person to vote for a lot, the court can appoint someone to vote for it (s.58).
  • Unanimous votes. The court override of a lone holdout on a unanimous vote (s.52) applies only to stratas of 10 or more lots. A duplex has no such route.

Tool 4: arbitration, if both agree

An owner can refer a dispute with the strata or with another owner to arbitration, a private hearing outside the tribunal and the court (s.177(2)). The dispute must be about the Act, the bylaws or rules, the common property, the use of a strata lot, money owing, or a decision of the strata or council (s.177(3)). The 2017 decision used the same idea for small day-to-day disputes: owners who agree in writing can choose a third party to decide.

Co-owners of one lot who disagree

Deadlock can also happen inside one lot. If two or more people share the vote for a lot and the chair is told they disagree on a matter, the chair must not count their vote (s.57(2)). In a duplex, that can leave the other lot’s single vote as the only one cast.

What to put in place before the next disagreement

The owners in 2017 BCCRT 26 had shared costs informally for years with earlier owners. It worked until a new owner arrived. These steps cost little and give a tribunal or a court a record to work from:

  1. Hold an AGM every year, with a budget passed and minutes kept (s.40, s.103).
  2. Collect strata fees into an operating fund and a reserve fund, at least 10% of the operating budget to the reserve (s.92; Regulation s.6.1(2)).
  3. Put every request for approval in writing, and answer in writing.
  4. Write down who repairs what, using Standard Bylaws 2 and 8 and your strata plan, and agree on it at a meeting.
  5. If you want a fixed way to break ties, talk to a lawyer about a bylaw for it. Any bylaw change takes a 3/4 vote, which in a duplex means both owners.

Our pages on the strata council and duplex stratas cover the rest of the rules for two owners. For three-lot stratas and the vote counts at each size, see when owners disagree.

We are building the StraPlex app for owners of 2 to 6 unit stratas, with requests, votes, meetings and minutes in one place, so each decision leaves a written record. The waitlist is below.

David Babakaiff, Co-Founder, VanPlex | PlexRank™ | Profit with Multiplex

Frequently asked questions

Who breaks a tie in a two-lot strata?

No one. Standard Bylaw 18(2) removes the president's tie-breaking vote at council when there are only 2 lots, and Standard Bylaw 27(6) does the same at general meetings. Both owners are on council under Bylaw 9(2), so a decision needs both.

What happens if one duplex owner will not attend the strata meeting?

Under s.48(3) of the Strata Property Act, unless the bylaws say otherwise, a meeting with no quorum after half an hour is adjourned one week. If there is still no quorum after half an hour at the adjourned meeting, the voters present form the quorum. A unanimous vote still needs every eligible voter.

What did the tribunal order in 2017 BCCRT 26?

In this deadlocked duplex near Sooke, the tribunal ordered the strata to repair one side of a seawall at that owner's expense, set up yearly home inspections with a way for one owner to hire contractors if they could not agree within 14 days, split common property repairs equally, and join a strata owners' association for help with future disputes.

Can the Civil Resolution Tribunal appoint an administrator for a duplex strata?

No. Only the BC Supreme Court can appoint an administrator, under s.174 of the Strata Property Act. In 2018 BCCRT 448 the tribunal noted it would not be the first deadlocked duplex to be run by an administrator.

Can a court override one owner who blocks a unanimous vote in a duplex?

No. The court override of a lone holdout on a unanimous vote in s.52 applies only to stratas with 10 or more lots.

StraPlex waitlist

Let StraPlex run your strata

StraPlex is an app that does the work of running a small strata. Its AI writes the notices, minutes and budgets, and the app tracks every deadline in the Strata Property Act, splits the fees and answers owners' questions. You approve, and it sends. Join the waitlist and get it first.

Which one is you?

We email you when the app opens. No spam, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

David Babakaiff

David Babakaiff

Co-Founder, VanPlex | 25+ Years BC Construction

David Babakaiff is Co-Founder of VanPlex and has worked in BC construction for more than 25 years. VanPlex's PlexRank™ algorithm scores residential parcels across BC for multiplex potential under Bill 44.

Want insights like this delivered weekly?

Join 2,500+ property owners getting ROI case studies, market data, and exclusive opportunities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.