Monitoring & Policy | Permit Uptake

Is the zoning producing permits, or sitting idle?

Bill 44 rezoning is easy to adopt and hard to evaluate. The only honest measure of whether it worked is permits pulled and units delivered — tracked over time, in context, not as a one-off count.

What we track

How many

Total multiplex permit applications and issuances, so you can see real uptake against the zoning you adopted — not assumptions.

What type

Duplex through six-plex, so you can tell whether you are getting the gentle density you intended or just the easiest form.

What stage

Submitted, under review, issued, or stalled — the pipeline, not just the finished count.

How long

Time from application to issuance, the number council asks about and the one that quietly decides whether builders come back.

Where

Which neighbourhoods are absorbing density and which are flat, mapped against transit and lot character.

The trend

Movement over time, so a slow quarter reads as a trend or a blip instead of a guess.

The point of monitoring

  • A permit count alone does not tell you whether your policy is working — it needs a baseline and a comparison.
  • Pairing permits with feasibility tells you why uptake is high or low, which is what council actually needs.
  • Tracked over time, the pipeline becomes an early warning, not a year-end surprise.

The core problem we solve

Low uptake usually traces back to density and cost

Density too low

Nothing gets built

Below a certain number of units, a multiplex can't cover land plus construction. Builders walk. The lot stays a single house and the upzoning produces no housing.

The viable range

Homes actually get built

Enough units that the project clears a builder's return threshold — so permits get pulled and units get delivered. This is the band you're trying to hit.

Density too high

Infrastructure can't take it

Past a point, servicing, traffic, and community capacity can't absorb the density — and council and neighbours push back. The plan stalls for a different reason.

Too little
Too much
Partner cities only

See your multiplex permit pipeline

We track multiplex permits across BC. We'll set up the pipeline for your municipality and pair it with the feasibility context that explains it.

  • Permit counts by type and stage, refreshed on a set cadence
  • Application-to-issuance timelines
  • Uptake mapped against where lots are actually viable
  • Trend lines you can take straight to council
Request access for your city

Frequently asked questions

Why not just count our own permits?+
You can, and you should. What a city usually cannot see easily is the context: how your uptake compares to neighbours, how it tracks against the share of lots that are actually viable to build, and whether a slow pipeline is a demand problem or an economics problem. That comparison is what turns a permit count into a decision.
What does low uptake usually mean?+
Most often it means the economics do not work on enough lots — the zoning is permissive but a multiplex does not pencil after land, construction, and fees. Sometimes it is process friction or timeline. Pairing permit data with feasibility data tells you which one you are looking at.
How current is the data?+
We track multiplex permits on an ongoing basis. Refresh cadence and exactly which fields you see are set up with your city as part of a monitoring partnership.

Want this for your municipality?

We already track multiplex permit uptake and lot-by-lot feasibility across BC. Tell us your city and we'll show you what your data says — and how a monitoring partnership works.